Archive for September 27th, 2010

Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:57:09 -0000

To: am-global@earthlink.net

From: “Bhavanath Rajpal”

Subject: Fake Mahaprayan Issue: Don’t Lump Together




These days many in AM understand that mahaprayan is one dogma. However

in criticizing the dogma of MPD, we must not abuse our Ananda Marga

practice of kiirtan. Rather we are to point out the hypocrisy of


1. In order to sell cigarettes, advertisers in some countries picture

healthy soldiers and famous athletes, as if by smoking such soldiers and

athletes became victors and champions in their field. While the message

and approach of that advertising campaign is faulty, it does not mean

that soldiers and athletes should be abused. Rather those tobacco

companies should be lambasted for their hypocrisy and deceitfulness.

2. Similarly, Hitler used the swastika to promote his nefarious misdeeds

and still today some use this symbol for their harmful agenda. We are to

oppose their ways, methods and outlook – not the swastika itself.

3. As we all know, Baba’s form and photo is very important. We meditate

on His image and if someone is abusing that sentiment to legitimize

their dogma then we should not discard or abuse Baba’s form and

image/photo. Rather we are to address that dogma. Our duty is to unmask

that dogma and abuse those culprits who are trying to legitimize their

false agenda and befool innocent people.

4. When criticizing idol worship we do not abuse or blame God Himself,

we attack those priests who invented that dogma of idol worship. We do

not abuse and break those idols nor do we blame God Himself. The dogma

of idol worship and God are two different things. They should not be

lumped together.

It is not hard to differentiate between these two facets. Every devotee

can understand such matters.

Similearly, we criticize the dogmatic tiirthas of various religions but

we never criticize the God that is related with that dogmatic tiirtha.

We abuse those who invented and propagandize about that tiirtha dogma.

5. In addressing the dogma of Mahaprayan, we should not abuse our

kiirtan mantra or practice. We should only describe how dogmatic people

want to legitimize their belief and dogma by attracting others with

kiirtan. We should criticize their approach but not the kiirtan itself.

6. This following example brings greater clarity to the issue. In a

pro-gay parade if they start chanting kiirtan to attract margiis to

join, we should not abuse kiirtan but rather the strategy by gay people.

Likewise, if to attract margiis certain bars play kiirtan to lure us to

drink alchol, then should margiis rush to that place. The bar should be

criticized, but not the kiirtan itself.

7. Fake MPD is like that. Certain powerful, greedy avadhutas created

this kiirtan programme to allure innocent and naive margiis to their

invented dogma of mahaprayan.

It is just like how people put sweet glue to attract flies and kill

them. Or how carnivorous plants emit a sweet arome attract bugs and eat


8. Here some naive margiis get attracted by kiirtan and get caught in

dogma of MPD and then they become permanent recruits of that dogma. In

that case, kiirtan should not be blamed, rather the crafty priests.

9. Furthermore, to promote their dogma of MPD, they have made a tomb and

collected Baba’s personal belongings in hopes of generating money by

showing Baba’s collection of walking sticks etc that are part of the

museum. We must not abuse Baba & HIs belongings for the misguided

actions or some opportunistic Dadas, rather we are to point out those

introducing such dogmas. Those belongings have their historical

importance in the museum. But we do not think that Baba is tied up in

that place or limited to the walking cane or tomb itself. All these

materials things are important for history. We must have respectful

feelings for those items but we cannot think that those physical

belongings represent Baba as a whole Personality.

10. It is similar to your grandfather’s photo. You have respect for

picture so if someone spits on it you will feel hurt because you have

feeling for your grandfather but at the same tim you know that the photo

is not your grandfather himself. Similarly margiis have respect for

those walking canes etc but it does not mean that we think that those

walking canes are Baba or that He is bound to that material thing.

11. Baba is omnipresent yet certain conniving groupists try to convince

others through their rituals that Baba is there in Tilajla. In such a

case, in our response those rituals should be abused not Taraka Brahma

Baba, nor His articles which are in the museum.

Baba knew beforehand what would happen that is why in various discourses

He already gave the answer. And that is that Parama Purusa is not bound

to any place or material article; He is everywhere, especially in the

hearts of devotees. He has repeated this idea in countless discourses.

12. We should not drown ourselves in atma samaj tattva – principle of

selfishness. We should not glue ourselves to the things which match the

self-interest of a group, clan, geographical area, community, or

financial program etc. No one should get stuck in this way and overlook

what Baba wants. That is selfishness.

As sadhakas, we should aim for sama samaj tattva – the principle of

social equality – and follow Baba’s guidelines and ideal that He

presides in hearts of devotees – not in a particular city or groupist

headquarters etc. We must not tie Him to a particular place.




Firstly, in order to legitimize their hypocrisy, some crooked people are

trying to use kiirtan on that very occasion of the death fo their father

& deceased relatives etc. They arrange similar programs on the

anniversary of those yearly shraddha ceremony of their deceased

relatives. They know well that shraddha is not an annual ceremony so

they mask their anniversary shraddha ceremony under the guise of

kiirtan. And they invite people on the point of kiirtan not for

anniversary of the death.

Secondly, some dogmatic wts wanted to make Baba Quarters around the

world as tiirtha sites. In that way they started various rituals as if

Baba exists there itself. So here we should be careful to oppose that

dogma yet we should not oppose Baba Himself and / or the materials and

belongings which He used. We should not confuse those materials as being

Baba. They are two different things. The shoe which He used is not Baba


Read Full Post »